The AK bayonet that a friend gave me is lighter, but completely non-functional as … They are fairly easy to find with a little looking. ), making it too big, heavy, and clunky. The M7 had a 6¾" long 1095 carbon steel blade and plastic grips. As far as I know, the only precedence for that is on the little black plastic M-10 scabbards used for the M7 bayonet. From the little I've been able to dig up about it on the net, the consensus is that it is better than previous bayonet models like the M7 and M9 at doing the things that knives are supposed to do. Mar 9, 2014 @ 6:22am M9 is a bit bigger and has a serrated part. The M9 Bayonet partially replaced the older M7 Bayonet, introduced in 1964. Although it has been claimed that the M9 may be more prone to breakage than the older M7, the M9 bayonet has a 20% thicker blade and tang (0.235" vs. 0.195") and a 75% greater cross-sectional area of steel in the blade than the M7. Foremost of these was the M7 bayonet, introduced in 1964. They tried to do too much with the M9 (utility knife, wire cutter, saw, etc. One thing I find interesting about the markings on this M9 is that the CAGE number (Civilian And Government Entity) and not the manufacturer's name is marked on the bayonet. However, they are rather uncommon. The number of Australian-contract M7 bayonets produced is not known. It was adopted around 10 yrs ago I believe. The M9 Bayonet partially replaced the older M7 Bayonet, introduced in 1964. The draw animations are different too. The M9 bayonet is the current issue. Not that I have much experience poking people with bayonets...but the M7 is a battle-tested proven design..based on the old M4 M1 carbine bayo..then the M5 Garand bayonet..and the M6 M14 bayonet....same basic blade as the M7..and all have some use as battle-tested stabbers. And it doesn't do any of its jobs very well. Australia procured the M7 bayonet at the same time they contracted with Buck Knives to produce an Australian-contract version of the Multipurpose Bayonet System M9. But I know little about the intended use of either. The M7 was and is a cheap piece of crap as opposed to the M9 which was and is an expensive piece of crap. The first of Colt's M7 bayonets were made 1961–1962 by … The two scabbards were then nested together and encased in a heat-sealed … Ontario M7-B Bayonet, 6.7" Carbon Steel Blade, Kraton Handle - 6277 $95.00 Sold Out Ontario 493 M9 Bayonet with Scabbard, Black Handle (6143) Among M7 bayonets, the best, IMO, is the Canadian C7 made by Nella. Eno. MARINES OKC-3S As a bayonet, the M7 is better than the M9. If you can find one, buy it! Beyond that, little is known about their procurement. I have an M7 bayonet and it is a bad knife. They run upwards of $100 to around $150. The Marines are evidently looking at a bayonet with a KaBar style blade. One thing I noticed is that there is good design and construction with it that can be appreciated. Shit, probably 500 of the things. It can be used on many other assault rifles, carbines, and combat shotguns, as well. Designed to be used as a hand weapon or fighting knife, the M7's primary role was as a bayonet for the M16 rifle and the M4 carbine. Bayonet vs m9 bayonet I was looking to get a knife and was wondering what the difference between the m9 bayonet and normal bayonet is? The M7 has been partially replaced by the M9 bayonet in Army service, and the Marine Corps replaced it with the OKC-3S bayonet. < > Showing 1-15 of 17 comments . The M7 and M9 are issued to all services. Bayonets were and are made by the millions in the most economical means possible. It has a large bowie style blade. The M9, in contrast, seems overly heavy to me. Although it has been claimed that the M9 may be more prone to breakage than the older M7, the M9 bayonet has a 20% thicker blade and tang (0.235" vs. 0.195") and a 75% greater cross-sectional area of steel in the blade than the M7. ... brand new M9 bayonets. And that as a bayonet, it is better than the M9 but still not quite as good as the old M7.